None of these theories really gel with me. It's not that I don't think they're correlative to the condition that we find Hal in in the Year of Glad, but that they aren't directly causative. I honestly feel that, if we can take as accurate Hal's admission that he dug up his father's head with Don Gately, isn't that enough of an explanation? I mean, he was already withdrawing from the world around him and his previous pleasures. Wouldn't the act of and the course of action leading to digging up your father's head (having not read it in ten years, I can't remember if the reader is ever shown Gately meeting Hal, and I'm pretty sure we don't know who prompts them to commit this grave robbery, but wouldn't that have to involve some seriously heavy shit going down?) push you over the line of sanity? Especially if you'd already started to falter a bit? And I surely don't mean this to sound as a reductively dismissive "he's just crazy" assessment, but if anyone in the novel could be excused of losing his mind . . .
Hamlet was always questioning his own sanity, as was the reader. I feel like with Hal there can be no question.
As for the admissions scene which opens the book, thematically is this not the great nightmare of society? Not only not being understood when we try to express ourselves but, worse, being perceived as insane? monsterish? useless? a liability to those around us?
|