Since we are beyond p. 390 I can add this remark about X.
Stephen Burn (p. 47 of his reader's guide) pointed out that November 8 is connected with the
discovery of X-rays. He remarked also that on the same day, X-rays appeared in two different situations:
during Eschaton (p. 330) and in
Burn writes: "The anniversary of the date when Roentgen saw inside himself, is the date in the novel when, at
E.T.A., the masks start to come off and the hidden interiors are revealed" (Ibidem p. 48).
So, here another meaning (not the only one) for the X. Actually I looked around for some more thoughts about the role of X-rays in the literature and I found this essay: Henderson, Linda Dalrymple. "X-rays and the Quest for Invisible
Reality in the Art of Kupka, Duchamp, and the Cubists." Art-Journal 47 (1988): 323-40.
http://www.jstor.org/pss/776982?cookieSet=1Here a short resumé of this essay: "Henderson obviously does not dispute the major role of the fourth dimension in Modernist art (see above), but she here argues that there is a second factor "contributing to the preoccupation with supersensible reality" -- the 1895 discovery of x-rays (323). Henderson's again airtight scholarship points to popular cultural texts of the early twentieth century to show that "the notion of clairvoyant, four-dimensional vision" was
inextricably linked (initially) with x-rays (332). For the Moderns, x-rays "clearly established the inadequacy of human sense perception and raised fundamental questions" about substance and reality which were more metaphysical than scientific (324). Henderson's welcome inclusion of advertisements, cartoons, and photos convey this "remarkable public response to x rays" (324) which is seen by her as a blanket admission of the inadequacy of human sensory observations.
This "relativity of perception" (326) suggested by x rays directly inspires (according to Henderson) artists such as Duchamp and Picasso who endeavor to represent "an invisible, immaterial reality" (336) in their works;
to see the unseen."
taken from
http://www.cwru.edu/artsci/engl/VSALM/m ... earch.htmlI wonder whether Wallace knew the Henderson studies. But I found that " to see the unseen" fits very well in
the Wallace's research.
Concerning the Xing activity, it can be argued that two persons involved in this activity, most of the time
form a sort of X or cross, or anyway two bodies with a central contact point... r