I think the videophone chapter is brilliant all by itself; it has always made me giddy, in that DFW is not only making keen observations on human nature but is making predictions based on them.
My all-time favorite is the Helen Steeply article on the the "prosthetic crime victim" (p 142-144)--in part for the story itself, but also for the ambiguous/misplaced modifiers ("ill gotten woman's Aigner purse"), sentences you have to read several times to get ("Her tragic, untimely, and, some might say, cruelly ironic fate, however, has been the subject of the all too frequent silence needless tragedies are buried beneath when the cast the callous misunderstanding of public officials in the negative light of public knowledge."), the seemingly arbitrary insertion of certain key words targeted to supermarket-checkout-line journalism ("fashionable", "active", "alert", "tragically', "callous"--all used multiple times within the short article), and the final sentence citing "the victim's heartless fate".
This evening, I was surprised at how loudly--and inappropriately, it feels like--I was laughing at the descriptions of the Units of the Enfield Marine Public Health Hospital complex--in particular, the pranks pulled by Ennet House residents on their (the Units') poor occupants (p 193-198).
|