Like Avery Edison said about this section in his essay this week: "I can't quite work work out whether I like it or not. Or even I like the idea of her [Madame Psychosis'] show or not."
And why, in the PR-circular of the Union of the Hideously and Improbably deformed does DFW include two things that don't belong i.e. "the fatally pulchritudinous" and "odalisques?" Well, I suppose these two categories could fit in with the idea of being "hated," after the fashion of an Ani Difranco song, whose title escapes me, that says that the two most hated people in a room are the ugliest woman and the most beautiful woman.
Once you look up all the words, you realize how gross some of the conditions really are, it' s a cornucopia of grossness and also---but this part is de-emphasized--human suffering in extremis because of how other people tend to react to certain types of affliction.
DFW makes a point of saying that Madame Psychosis' tone is "reflective but not judgmental somehow." I can't help feeling that he says this because he's trying to influence the way we see her spiel so he's giving us a little spiel himself. The clinicopathological laundry list of the hideous, the twist on a Christimas carol title ("Come All Ye Hateful"), the term "Two-Bagger"--judgmental as hell, if your reading it aloud publicly as one who doesn't have these problems. I kind of think by explicitly saying MP is not judgemental, DFW is trying to have it both ways, to be mean-spirited but trying to have it come off as merely a parade of interesting language. This is not to say that I think DFW was mean-spirited. Did he include the fatally beautiful and odalisques to also make it not seem so?
I can sort of see a punk rock college radio show where some hipster reads sections of this pamphlet and cues related tracks (don't ask me to list what they are) on air just to be funny.
And why this group MP is reading the circular of "an agnostic-style" 12-step group when in the next Ennet House section endnote 69 states "In none of these Anonymous fellowships anywhere is it possible to avoid confronting the God stuff" ? Is it somehow significant that the aesthetically-challenged don't turn to God in _their_ recovery?
I can't say I wasn't impressed by DFW's sheer knowledge of the conditions. I also couldn't help thinking, God forbid that Hitler would have had this command of language and this vocabulary to describe what his idea of a non-Aryan is.
So, yeah in the end I don't really know what I feel about it.
|